Asus PRIME Z370M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '19 at 03:40
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 249
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 904
87% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,140
70% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.0
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 36.9
31% 35 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 0.13
18% 25.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxmemory X100 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 348 3.3 26 10 137 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
Read 505
Write 394
Mixed 366
SusWrite 121
77% 347 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 94.7
DQ Write 7.1
DQ Mixed 0.6
13% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
504GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 164 164 164 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 151
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 164
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
640GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 173 175 177 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 174
Mixed 38
SusWrite 174
105% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 32GB
25GB free, PID b128
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 23 24 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 104
Write 31.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 24.1
48% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
38% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 33%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 106 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 118
Write 103
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 107
132% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 59%
ST375064 0A 750GB
398GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 35.7
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 36.1
46% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 17%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
823GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 181 181 182 181 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 188
Write 141
Mixed 92
SusWrite 178
197% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU880-32A160T 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 26.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 27
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback