Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320MA-M.2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170613
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateApr 28 '19 at 20:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 65
1-Core 32
2-Core 23.5
32% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 54.8
8-Core 58
7% 56.4 Pts
64-Core 52.5
3% 52.5 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.1% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 125
Parallax 120
99% 122 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 120
Splatting 104
87% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
644GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 103 42 67 87 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 44
SusWrite 72.3
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 107%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 478GB
18GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 25 12 5.4 51 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G213381 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320MA-M.2-CF Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback