Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '16 at 09:06
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 179
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 349
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 59
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 63
48% 66.2 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 69.9
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 406
Mixed 412
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 30.3
151% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 68.2
DQ Mixed 43.2
56% 105 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
745GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 163
Mixed 150
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.37
144% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
Inateck FE2005 480GB
347GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 320
Write 312
Mixed 195
342% 276 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 4.08
2,244% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 5.57
2,764% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 291%
This bench: 303%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 16.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback