Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 17:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 132
52% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 200
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.5% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 107
Parallax 93.1
83% 101 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 101
Splatting 101
82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 73 44 55 52 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 288
Write 256
Mixed 269
SusWrite 59.2
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 7.7
72% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 33
72% 147 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
681GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 145 146 148 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 149
Mixed 99
SusWrite 146
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
220% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL KINGBOX-1600 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback