Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z97X-SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '19 at 21:27
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 573
63% 498 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 75.2
63% 77.1 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 72.9
59% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1294 304 299 303 303 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,359
Write 1,475
Mixed 575
SusWrite 468
216% 969 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 50.2
212% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,073
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 672
600% 907 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 192%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 EVO mSATA 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RVT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 450 430 400 459 458 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 442
Mixed 425
SusWrite 445
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 63.6
199% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 125%
Great: 128%
Samsung PM871b M.2 2280 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: MVT22D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 312 312 312 313 311 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 441
Mixed 401
SusWrite 324
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 64.9
214% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 121%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
499GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 147 150 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 147
Write 147
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 149
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 Hynix HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB Hynix HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.7% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 18.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 23.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback