Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 26 '19 at 18:59
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 596
65% 515 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 115
Parallax 95.6
87% 106 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 103
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 199 191 200 214 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 354
Write 340
Mixed 310
SusWrite 209
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 32.9
107% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 206
151% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
35GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 172 183 173 157 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 356
Write 340
Mixed 308
SusWrite 161
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 32.4
106% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 160
134% 195 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $886
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback