Monster ABRA A5 V16.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.3
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 23:34
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 826
82% 667 Pts
64-Core 1,059
66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8560) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.19
Parallax 6.41
5% 7.3 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 12.6
8% 8.76 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 399 398 410 396 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 408
Mixed 400
SusWrite 402
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 42
143% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 278
231% 332 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 168 169 169 167 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 142
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 167
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.3 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback