TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Biostar H81MHV3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateApr 24 '19 at 16:48
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 189
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 362
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 75.9%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 38.5
37% 38.5 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 37.1
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 35.3%
 Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV300S37A/240G 250GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 160 76 83 70 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 456
Write 450
Mixed 357
SusWrite 108
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 42.2
149% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 252
206% 292 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 84.8%
 Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 158 155 164 161 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 153
Write 146
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 154
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 88.1%
 Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
552GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 185 184 188 186 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 142
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 184
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 18.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 58.6%
 Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H81MHV3 Builds (Compare 916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples126x
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples86x
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples85x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples144x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples76x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples64x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples51x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples25x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples18x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples32x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples19x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples14x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback