Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 22:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 703
74% 593 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 204 82 41 61 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 423
Write 285
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 108
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 11.3
41% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 14.1
12% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 56%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
54GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 69 64 102 39 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56% Above average
Read 137
Write 95.3
Mixed 116
SusWrite 103
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 28.6
113% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 124
120% 189 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown< BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 36.6
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 32
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback