Vizio CT15T-B0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemVizio CT15T-B0  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta VZ8A
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '16 at 04:44
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4657M APU
CPU_1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 87.2
45% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 140
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G
Quanta(152D 1035) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 6.47
3% 5.33 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 4.91
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNW128GMCP 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L0913A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 240
Write 150
Mixed 185
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 3.3
34% 9.35 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 257 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback