PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Positivo POS-PIH81DI (all builds) |
Motherboard | Positivo POS-PIH81DI |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141208 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 22 '19 at 05:25 |
Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
68.1%
Good
|
65% 112 Pts
|
42% 322 Pts
|
21% 344 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.2
|
54.9%
Above average
|
56% 76.2 fps
|
52% 64.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 42 50 51 46 39 MB/s
|
28.3%
Poor
|
36% 48.7 MB/s
|
85% 0.57 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB
71GB free
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
38% 52.2 MB/s
|
155% 1.03 MB/s
|
|
![]() Mass Storage Device 320GB
198GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
6.64%
Terrible
|
21% 15.6 MB/s
|
17% 0.2 MB/s
|
|
![]() Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 2 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.5 MB/s
|
4.22%
Terrible
|
6% 6.65 MB/s
|
18% 1.6 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown SH564128FH8N0QHSCR Samsung F6451U64F9333G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
52.8%
Above average
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
53% 75.9 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples | 49x |
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 32x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 5x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 36x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $107 |