Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 61.5 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 121 48% 81 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 495 43% 368 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.69 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 106 38 68 62 52 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 131 Write 100 Mixed 139 SusWrite 61.2 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 21.6 71% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 33.5 28% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 111GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 100 99 100 101 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 94.5 Write 94.2 Mixed 46 SusWrite 99.2 61% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 50GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16