PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140407 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 20 '19 at 15:14 |
Run Duration | 266 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 389.20
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 272 273 276 276 276 MB/s
|
97.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
116GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 64 66 65 66 MB/s
|
40.5%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$22
225GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 60 62 62 62 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
156GB free
Firmware: D005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 68 69 68 69 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56
720GB free
Firmware: AX1P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 101 102 102 102 MB/s
|
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 869x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 645x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 439x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 187x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 160x |
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 120x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $357 |