Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive13% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte G1.Sniper B5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130803
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 22:59
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 197
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 511
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 95.5
Reflection 114
Parallax 102
78% 104 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 101
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13% Very poor
Read 27
Write 48
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 11.8
6% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 12.1
24% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 6
DQ Mixed 1.7
18% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 13%
Great: 78%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
483GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 36 36 37 36 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 33
Write 45.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 36.4
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 65%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
766GB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 120 120 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 119
69% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 91%
WD Elements 1TB
28GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 37
Write 35.2
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 37.1
47% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF ACR512X64D3U13C9G 99U5474-038.A00LF ACR512X64D3U13C9G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF Builds (Compare 763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback