HP 2000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 2000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 188B
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '16 at 03:57
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 49.5
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 39.7
26% 36.6 Pts
4-Core 41.9
8-Core 39.5
6% 40.7 Pts
64-Core 41.4
3% 41.4 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340
HP(103C 188B) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.55 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Clover CN-M640MBB 640GB
578GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 97.8
Mixed 96.3
73% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.33
73% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 55%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB
29GB free, PID fa0f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 7.71
Mixed 9.26
15% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.99
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.007
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 2000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback