Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140903
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '19 at 02:54
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 67.8 2-Core 116 51% 83.9 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 196 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Sapphire(174B E271) CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 29.9 Parallax 39.7 27% 34.3 fps	MRender 27 Gravity 27.8 Splatting 35.4 25% 30.1 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB 7,201 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 196 200 198 196 199 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 419 Write 368 Mixed 287 SusWrite 210 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 35 117% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 235 181% 247 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 107%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 125GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 112 111 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 114 Write 105 Mixed 68.9 SusWrite 110 73% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 56GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 111 105 117 122 121 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 163 Write 144 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 113 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GKH400UD25608 2x4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	36.4% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 15.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.3 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A78M-D3H Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	16x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	16x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	10x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	12x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	12x
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples	7x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	9x
500GB SATA SSD 500GBPNYBench 79%, 421 samples	7x
Vertex 4 128GBOCZ $215Bench 88%, 19,372 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 52%, 1,736 samples	7x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	5x
8GBH2X04F1AA2 2x8GBUnknownBench 45%, 412 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $126

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16