Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '16 at 09:29
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 176
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 333
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 48.2
39% 51.1 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 59
49% 59.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 401
Mixed 410
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 28.8
146% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 36.6
52% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
745GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 162
Mixed 150
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.69
4K Mixed 0.38
142% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96%
Great: 109%
Inateck FE2005 480GB
347GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 318
Write 302
Mixed 141
308% 254 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 3.93
2,189% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 5.55
2,794% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 291%
This bench: 296%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $324
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback