TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20378

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20378  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y50-70
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '19 at 20:53
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 142
69% 111 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 387
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 68.4%
 Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 2.38
1% 6.57 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.43%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$135
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 451 459 456 461 461 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 450
Mixed 321
SusWrite 457
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 29.7
101% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 221
200% 305 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 93.1%
 Great: 119%
Seagate BACKUP+ 256GB
74GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 232 236 234 236 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 236
Write 218
Mixed 181
SusWrite 230
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 20.5
73% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 102
78% 105 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 50.8%
 Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 19.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 56.3%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 20378 Builds (Compare 2,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20378

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples1,367x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples1,017x
Core i5-4210HIntelBench 55%, 12,540 samples228x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples1,795x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples629x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples407x
SSD
MZ7TE512HMHP-000 512GBSamsungBench 75%, 3,033 samples136x
MZ7TE256HMHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 69%, 2,145 samples128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples102x
RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples419x
RMT3160ME68FAF1600 2x8GBRamaxelBench 52%, 3,672 samples236x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples224x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback