Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180416
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateApr 16 '19 at 23:20
Run Duration339 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 235
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 906
80% 680 Pts
64-Core 2333
144% 2333 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 183
Parallax 192
112% 171 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 173
Splatting 121
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1473 1280 1464 1597 1575 1577 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 4,244
Write 1,684
Mixed 810
SusWrite 1,494
451% 2,058 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 51.8
199% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 35.8
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 49.3
42% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 325%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
14GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,360
Write 1,687
Mixed 932
503% 2,326 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 55.6
211% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 39.9
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 244
146% 150 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 354%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
332GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1721 1742 1725 1664 1622 1636 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 4,348
Write 1,697
Mixed 941
SusWrite 1,685
476% 2,168 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 55.7
212% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 40.3
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 216
134% 143 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 346%
Great: 354%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
2TB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 407 439 458 459 458 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 84% Great: 131%
Intel SSDPECME040T4 2TB
767GB free
Firmware: 0171
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2005 1917 1881 1878 1943 2007 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
374% Outstanding
Read 4,255
Write 2,330
Mixed 1100
SusWrite 1,938
532% 2,406 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 95.4
247% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 532
284% 245 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 374%
Great: 502%
HPT DISK 0_0 18TB
14TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 178 178 178 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3466 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
168% Outstanding
MC Read 70.2
MC Write 65.8
MC Mixed 65.5
192% 67.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 27.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 171%
This bench: 168%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $832
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback