Acer Aspire V5-572G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-572G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_CX
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '16 at 16:30
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 69.5
48% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 124
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0798) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 2.75
3% 5.36 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.48
4% 4.86 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 250GB-$299
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT43B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 495
Write 340
Mixed 324
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 17.9
79% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 24.8
58% 123 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
7GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 51.2
Write 65.5
Mixed 61.5
45% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.15
37% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-572G Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-572G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback