Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180615
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '19 at 21:19
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Memory 92.5 1-Core 130 2-Core 261 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 934 87% 727 Pts	64-Core 1,723 107% 1,723 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6162) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (100^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (74 fps cap detected)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 73.3 Reflection 75.3 Parallax 65.3 60% 71.3 fps	MRender 73.3 Gravity 70.3 Splatting 73.4 59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 813GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 451 458 455 455 420 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 413 Mixed 309 SusWrite 450 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 39.8 153% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 265 222% 320 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.4% Good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.6 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD3P-CF Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	74x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	21x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	11x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	11x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GBSeagateBench 117%, 6,074 samples	5x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD $37Bench 244%, 109,999 samples	5x

RAM
BLS4G4D240FSA.8FAR 4x4GBCrucialBench 85%, 283 samples	8x
BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 347 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $465

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16