Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 15:34
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 280
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 923
90% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 155
Parallax 142
109% 144 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 135
Splatting 117
98% 120 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 309 326 325 272 314 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 1,154
Mixed 527
SusWrite 352
191% 862 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 58.8
224% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 1,020
DQ Mixed 669
601% 908 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 192%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
114GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 111 110 107 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 112
Write 85.9
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 109
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
205GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 134 134 135 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 101
Write 72.2
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 134
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.4
419% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
109GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 136 137 137 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 107
Write 69.2
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 136
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 3TB
793GB free
Firmware: 1404
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 131 132 131 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 116
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 131
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZB CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZB 32GB
3001, 3001, 3001, 3001 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 30.7
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 31.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback