Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 13:32
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 290
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 949
92% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 100%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 156
Parallax 129
110% 140 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 135
Splatting 117
98% 120 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 130 106 111 119 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,340
Write 1,099
Mixed 437
SusWrite 175
169% 763 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 46.6
208% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 997
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 847
656% 900 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 168%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
114GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 99 99 100 100 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60% Good
Read 110
Write 73.4
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 98.7
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
99GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 138 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 93.9
Write 53
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 138
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.3
406% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
41GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 117 123 119 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 118
Write 68.8
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 120
61% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.2
395% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 3TB
982GB free
Firmware: 1404
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 140 139 139 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 144
Mixed 83
SusWrite 139
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZB CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZB 32GB
3001, 3001, 3001, 3001 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 30.5
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 31.7
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback