Lenovo 7052A7U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 7052A7U (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110711
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '19 at 00:53
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 164 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 304 35% 275 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 232 232 227 231 233 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66% Good	Read 252 Write 230 Mixed 220 SusWrite 231 53% 233 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 32.4 106% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 192 144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 124%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 289GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 53.3 Write 52.5 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 52.5 37% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 35%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB 1,723 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 23GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 26 Mixed 7.7 15% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	6% Terrible	Read 19 Write 6.7 Mixed 8.8 SusWrite 11 14% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 99U5471-001.A00LF Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	47.5% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.4 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7052A7U Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7052A7U

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	29x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	2x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	12x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	5x

SSD
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
WDBNCE0010PNC 1TBWDCBench 97%, 21,221 samples	2x

RAM
CT51264BA1339.M16F Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 RMR5030KQ68F9F1600 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GBUnknownBench 44%, 4 samples	4x
1600 CL9 Series 1600 CL9 Series PSD34G160081 PSD34G160081 16GBUnknownBench 49%, 3 samples	3x
CT25664BA160BA.C16 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL CT25664BA160BA.C16 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 20GBUnknownBench 48%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16