Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 11:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 121
54% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 206
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 59
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 47.8
48% 55.3 fps
MRender 75.3
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 57.3
52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 42 11 57 53 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 371
Write 275
Mixed 213
SusWrite 79.1
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 17.7
62% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 21.7
17% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
724GB free
Firmware: SBM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 60 56 111 122 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 60.1
Write 62
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 85.1
51% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.1
72% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback