Asrock FM2A88M Pro3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Pro3+  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 12 '19 at 16:08
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A4-7300 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22% Poor
1-Core 73
2-Core 119
47% 96 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 122
17% 122 Pts
64-Core 116
8% 116 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 1GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 57
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 52.3
14% 49.8 fps
MRender 47.5
Gravity 55.5
Splatting 37.4
15% 46.8 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 78 77 80 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42% Average
Read 69.9
Write 63.8
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 76.2
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS723030BLE640 3TB
229GB free
Firmware: MX6OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 107 116 112 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 20
SusWrite 111
70% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
184GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 28 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 28.3
Mixed 26
SusWrite 28.2
38% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 19%
Memorex TD 2B 0GB
0GB free, PID 1600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.95% Terrible
Read 6
Write 1.3
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 1.6
3% 2.78 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 101%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical FM2A88M Pro3+ Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Pro3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $135Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $238Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $351Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback