Asus G750JX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus G750JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JX
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 02 '16 at 10:23
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 40.8
33% 44.3 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 386
28% 256 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M
Asus(1043 213E) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.13
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 3.94
3% 3.32 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.07
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 97.1
Write 83.1
Mixed 97.7
70% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.24
74% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 71%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
14GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 102
Mixed 97.3
75% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.28
83% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Kingston 99U5428-053.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JX Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback