MSI Z270 GAMING PRO (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180130
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateApr 10 '19 at 02:39
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 273
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 667
73% 578 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 84.9
0% 50.3 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 55.7
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 17%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 11 18 5.6 9.7 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.2% Poor
Read 130
Write 19
Mixed 31
SusWrite 11.1
10% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 17.1
72% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 48.3
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 24.3
20% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 500GB-$93
43GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 305 306 298 297 292 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 475
Write 377
Mixed 251
SusWrite 305
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 33.5
111% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 235
200% 292 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
6GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 150 139 131 118 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 118
Write 99.8
Mixed 76
SusWrite 133
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3300831SCE 300GB
5GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 52 51 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 49
Write 13.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 51.1
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
2GB free
Firmware: CC38
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62.5
Write 50.5
Mixed 51.2
41% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
JMicron 2TB
400GB free
Firmware: 0223
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 80 78 79 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 80.1
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.7
177% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 104%
JMicron 2TB
2GB free
Firmware: 0223
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5
Write 39.2
Mixed 11.5
14% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.2
109% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 104%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
2GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Read 13
Write 6
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 15.4
14% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 32GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 26.6
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.1
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO (MS-7A59)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $675
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback