Acer Nitro AN515-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181205
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateApr 09 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 246
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 632
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 6.47
6% 15 fps
MRender 9.76
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 13.6
8% 9.66 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 29 43 48 13 10 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 200
Write 102
Mixed 273
SusWrite 81.3
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 30.1
108% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 180
167% 255 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 102%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
123GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 108 82 251 126 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 869
Write 562
Mixed 571
SusWrite 187
122% 548 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 48.2
156% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 324
268% 376 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 113%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 029E CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-53 Builds (Compare 2,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback