HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	4.08% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z800 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory	33.7 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '19 at 09:02
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 148 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 592 52% 444 Pts	64-Core 864 54% 864 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gainward(10B0 1004) 3GB CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 53.8 Parallax 68.9 45% 59.4 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 52.2 50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 13 28 5.1 12 31 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	4.08% Terrible	Read 25.2 Write 27.2 Mixed 50 SusWrite 18.7 7% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 3.3 5% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 4.08% Great: 55%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 66GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 666 675 357 277 274 274 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	145% Outstanding	Read 1254 Write 427 Mixed 428 SusWrite 420 139% 632 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 39.8 138% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 734 DQ Write 476 DQ Mixed 616 457% 609 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 119GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 296 272 302 290 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 357 Write 306 Mixed 234 SusWrite 284 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 26.4 91% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 100 97% 153 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 110%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 29GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 53 52 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 62.8 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 52.4 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 49%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 22 Write 49.2 Mixed 23.5 24% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 326GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 102 102 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 91.7 Write 92.3 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 101 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 84%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 32GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 159 158 156 144 180 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 148 Write 150 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 164 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 284% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 109%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 172GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 24.5 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 19.1 32% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 60%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 33GB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 26 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 19.4 33% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 124% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:83 0... 82GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.8% Above average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 20.1 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	161x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	88x
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	67x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16