Asus CM1730/CM1830

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	9.33% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus CM1730/CM1830 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM1730,CM1830
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130327
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '19 at 03:56
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 220 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 39% AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 73.9 1-Core 41.4 2-Core 80.6 43% 65.3 Pts	4-Core 81.2 8-Core 82 11% 81.6 Pts	64-Core 81.4 5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8388) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.34 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 1.13 1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
PNY XLR8 120GB-$150 48 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 524ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 3.5 2.2 1.7 3.4 1.9 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.33% Terrible	Read 119 Write 48.8 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 4.4 10% 45 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 16% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 9.33% Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 9GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 57 57 59 59 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 76.7 Write 70.1 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 56 48% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 10GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 60 59 60 60 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 177 Write 138 Mixed 65 SusWrite 58.3 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 113%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 34GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 5GB free, PID 00a9 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.7 8.9 8.8 8.9 8.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	5.98% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 10.4 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 8.4 13% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.98% Great: 9%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB 3,704 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 14GB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 8.7 9.3 9.1 9.4 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.99% Terrible	Read 26.7 Write 24.9 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 9.2 27% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.99% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 17GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.2 9.4 9.2 9.4 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 26.3 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 10 27% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 43%
Generic- Multi-Card 64GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 52GB free, PID 0158 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 11 12 10 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	5.78% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 7.7 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 11.2 16% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 17%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 11GB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 8.7 9.3 9.2 9.3 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.62% Terrible	Read 26.6 Write 24.4 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 9.2 27% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.1 45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 9.62% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM1730/CM1830 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1730/CM1830

CPU
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples	16x
Phenom II X6 1065TAMDBench 55%, 1,141 samples	10x
Phenom II X4 925AMD $150Bench 51%, 5,211 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	9x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	5x
Radeon HD 8490AMDBench 2%, 4,568 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	7x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16