Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150106
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateAug 30 '16 at 22:11
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 121
51% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 201
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 60.3
52% 64.2 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 54.8
50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
746GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 141
Write 151
Mixed 145
110% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.2
81% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 13.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback