HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180710
Uptime	7.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '19 at 11:44
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 398 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 32.9 2-Core 66.4 41% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 354 27% 243 Pts	64-Core 1,140 71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 52.8 Reflection 68.4 Parallax 70.2 43% 63.8 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 69.5 Splatting 72.3 58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 60 323 47 39 43 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.9% Below average	Read 182 Write 51.2 Mixed 252 SusWrite 85.2 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 12.7 44% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 124 95% 129 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 102%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 58 171 171 171 172 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 176 Write 44.2 Mixed 102 SusWrite 124 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CMA 4x16GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 12 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 19.7 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.2 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	170x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16