MSI MS-1757

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE70 2OC\2OE
MotherboardMSI MS-1757  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '19 at 01:10
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 424
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 10E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.69
Parallax 6.62
3% 5.74 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CHN mSATAM1 128 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 337 340 341 347 322 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 444
Write 323
Mixed 214
SusWrite 337
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 14
84% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 87.4
104% 176 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
813GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 88.2
Write 85.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 89.1
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.4% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1757 Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1757

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback