Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181004
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 14:30
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 213
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 420
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.3.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 86.7
58% 76.7 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 57.9
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN01SM19EG120GB 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0724A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 436
Write 403
Mixed 148
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 11.1
105% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 29.7
56% 111 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
149GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 65 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 131
Write 123
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 65.2
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung V-GeN D4S4GL32A8TL 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 38.4
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 28.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback