PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Intel Thurley |
Motherboard | Koloe X58 (all builds) |
Memory | 14.2 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180105 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 03 '19 at 14:18 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5667
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
69.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 247 241 247 248 248 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 4TB
119GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 29 30 30 30 MB/s
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 device 4TB
186GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 device 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 MXIC 25L8005 41GB
1600, 33 MHz
8192, 33792 MB
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 88x |
Xeon X5660IntelBench 71%, 6,950 samples | 78x |
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 58x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 31x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |