Acer Aspire V5-552P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V5-552P  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_RL
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130528
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 22:49
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5357M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 71
46% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 73.8
8-Core 76
10% 74.9 Pts
64-Core 74.9
5% 74.9 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8450G
Acer(1025 080E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 3.22
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 2.83
Splatting 4.04
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$52
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 351 346 357 364 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 443
Write 376
Mixed 383
SusWrite 343
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 35.6
115% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 137
103% 137 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF186D.M16 Elpida EBJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 12GB
933, 667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-552P Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-552P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback