Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V5-552P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V5-552P  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_RL
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 05:57
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5357M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 43
2-Core 70.9
36% 55.8 Pts
4-Core 86.5
8-Core 94.2
12% 90.3 Pts
64-Core 85.1
5% 85.1 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8450G
Acer(1025 080E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.22
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 2.83
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 295 324 343 352 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 453
Write 327
Mixed 363
SusWrite 326
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 37.2
124% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 164
125% 170 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF186D.M16 Elpida EBJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 12GB
933, 667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-552P Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-552P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback