Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics92.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 19:05
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 325
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 897
94% 752 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2408 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 121
Parallax 105
94% 114 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 108
Splatting 108
90% 110 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,196
Write 1,666
Mixed 698
334% 1,520 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 69.3
292% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1112
DQ Write 1,320
DQ Mixed 1,073
848% 1,168 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
28GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.U
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 510
Write 505
Mixed 328
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 44.1
169% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 69
129% 255 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
688GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 475 477 478 478 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 467
Mixed 442
SusWrite 477
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 67.5
227% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 302
244% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 137%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
128GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 113 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 100
Write 104
Mixed 66
SusWrite 112
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
305GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 177 177 177 177 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 148
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 176
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 859B BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 28.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 29.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $759
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback