Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 30 '19 at 19:37
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 855
88% 708 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 117
Parallax 113
91% 114 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 104
Splatting 105
87% 106 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,139
Write 1650
Mixed 626
324% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 71.6
283% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,162
DQ Write 1,372
DQ Mixed 1,136
892% 1,223 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
28GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.U
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 505
Write 503
Mixed 329
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 44.1
166% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 68.5
130% 260 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
736GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 477 474 477 442 431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 452
Mixed 420
SusWrite 463
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 63.2
220% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 299
242% 344 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 134%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
128GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 113 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 112
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB
306GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 165 170 171 169 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 146
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 168
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD 859B BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 28.7
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 29.7
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $759
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback