Lenovo 20BWS0MV00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20BWS0MV00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BWS0MV00
Memory14.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 18:22
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 179
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 242
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5036) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 5.43
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 6.62
4% 5.57 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 5.03
Splatting 8
5% 5.85 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4133101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 166 164 161 167 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 446
Write 269
Mixed 231
SusWrite 156
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 27.8
117% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 210
171% 247 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4B8G1646B-MYK0 1315 CT204864BF160B.M16 20GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback