Alienware X51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware X51  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0KM92T
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 10:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 166
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 331
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Nvidia(10DE 100F) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.1% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 10.7
7% 9.37 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 11.8
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.1%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 191 214 221 226 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.1% Above average
Read 254
Write 222
Mixed 217
SusWrite 205
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 26.5
89% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 159
118% 154 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
931GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 121 125 126 119 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72% Very good
Read 129
Write 127
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 122
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X51 Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Alienware X51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback