Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 19:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 117
55% 87 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 346
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 70.7
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 97.5
58% 78.6 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 57.5
54% 67 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0624AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 48 47 47 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 258
Write 280
Mixed 304
SusWrite 46.2
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 22.5
101% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 85.4
DQ Mixed 42.9
37% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 95%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
250GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 61 60 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 61
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 60.3
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 1600 CL9 Series F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 1600 CL9 Series 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback