Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 19:53
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 94
51% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 354
32% 267 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 134 131 130 138 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 137
Write 133
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 131
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 6.6 6.2 6 5.8 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 7.2
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 6.4
10% 7.37 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.6
108% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 18%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
111GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 17 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 18.4
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 16.4
24% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT41GU6BFR8C-PBHJ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback