Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2V  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140709
Uptime15 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 11:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 279
38% 280 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.42 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.74
5% 5.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 362 378 394 400 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 458
Write 388
Mixed 261
SusWrite 384
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 16.6
109% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 275
230% 331 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 119%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
866GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 153 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 142
Mixed 105
SusWrite 154
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 99U5584-017.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2V Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback