Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2V  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140709
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '19 at 12:17
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 281
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 4.53
3% 4.46 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 383 385 394 390 402 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 323
Mixed 295
SusWrite 389
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 28.3
135% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 213
196% 302 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98%
Great: 119%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
899GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 153 156 157 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 150
Mixed 109
SusWrite 155
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 91%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 99U5584-017.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2V Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback