ECS VX900-I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardECS VX900-I  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120330
Uptime37.4 Days
Run DateMar 31 '19 at 02:42
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 51
1-Core 13.2
2-Core 12.1
21% 25.4 Pts
4-Core 12.1
8-Core 13.4
2% 12.8 Pts
64-Core 11.7
1% 11.7 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
VIA Chrome9 HD IGP
Elitegroup(1019 7C8E) 256MB
Driver: VTGUModeDX32A.dll Ver. 8.14.14.232
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.27
0% 0.17 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.7 23 46 38 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 53.3
Write 50.9
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 28.4
29% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 33%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
74GB free
Firmware: 10.01E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.8 25 46 40 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 25.5
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 29.6
24% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10241925 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 1.9
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 2.1
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 157
25% 157 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback