HP p6-2310ea

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP p6-2310ea  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory16.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 18:05
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 85.2
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 73.3
47% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 74.9
8-Core 74.7
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 75.2
5% 75.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 5.19
4% 4.73 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 6.09
4% 5.42 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22
Write 19.7
Mixed 21.5
16% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
769GB free
Firmware: CC25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 179
Write 93.1
Mixed 79.8
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
SAMSUNG HM250JI 250GB
182GB free, PID 00db
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.2
Write 4.3
Mixed 19.5
19% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 CT102464BA160B.C16 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2310ea Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2310ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback