PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121210 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 29 '19 at 09:56 |
Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 977 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 355 358 358 370 368 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 69x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 46x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 44x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 17x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 16x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $548 |