Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H270M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171127
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 06:27
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7350K-$42
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 264
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 372
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 9.34
7% 9.6 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 18.7
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 653 429 598 677 677 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 875
Write 679
Mixed 525
SusWrite 614
151% 674 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 52.9
209% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 523
DQ Write 683
DQ Mixed 512
412% 572 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 163%
Great: 185%
Mushkin MKNSSDTR250GB 250GB
78GB free
Firmware: O1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 83 84 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 444
Mixed 381
SusWrite 115
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 56.4
193% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 256
213% 307 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 98%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
482GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 471 463 485 484 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 494
Mixed 451
SusWrite 474
109% 483 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 63.3
215% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 23.5
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 25.1
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback